About Me

Name: Absolutely...
Email: levy.nobama.alan@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

We Won. Yippee.

As of this writing, Libyan dictator Mommar Qadaffi has flown the coup. The rebels have taken Tripoli and this stage of the Libyan Civil War is over, thanks to the United States, mostly.
In the coming days, Chairman Obama's sycophants in the arrogant and lazy press are going to paint this as some sort of "great victory for Democracy". Chris "I'll Have Another Drink" Matthews (H/T Mark Levin) will get thrills up both his legs, rather than one. Rachel Maddcow will tell us tales about how our Dear Leader stood up to those pests Congress who kept insisting that the United States should concentrate on the two wars it's already involved in. I'm sure Keith Olbermann will be doing his happy dance for all eight of Current TV's viewers. Happy days have returned to the People's Republic of Progressivakia! Seig heil, Fuhrer Obama! All hail Progressivakian Imperialism! Hope and Che for all! 2+2=5!
Now, let me be among the first to ask this very, very important question: Exactly what did we win ?
Sure, the victims of Pan Am 103 get some justice. I'm all for that. Mommar Qadaffiduck was a state sponsor of terror and a vile piece of excrement that the world doesn't need in power. There's no question that the world is .0000000000001% safer with Qadaffiduck not in power. But the answer to the question above is:
Nothing. We have won nothing.
Despite this "victory", unemployment will still be at 9.2% for the foreseeable future. The housing market will still be dead. Gas prices will still be absurd. The stock market will still be as schizophrenic as Ron Paul's cyberstormtroopers. American troops will still risking their lives in Iraq and Trashcanistan. Uncle Sam will still be drowning in red ink, and oh yes, the American people will still be oppressed by the Big Mommy Regime in Washington DC.
In other words, nothing will change, other than fact that America will be footing the bill for all kinds of goodies for the Libyan people. The American tax payer will be paying for roads, bridges, schools, and kinds of "shovel-ready projects" in Libya that they will never use or benefit from, much like in Iraq and Trashcanistan. While I support the wars in both places, I do not support the way they are being fought. Either fight to win or don't bother fighting. This winning "hearts and minds" crap is one of the big reasons The War on Terror is entering its 10th year. I don't blame this on the brave men and women who are serving in those hell holes, I blame the squeamish politicians who are directing the war. (Yeah, I know, I'm a heartless "neocon imperialist". Blah, blah, blah. Yadda, yadda, yadda.) The American taxpayer will have his taxes raised so his wealth can be redistributed to the "worthy" Libyans.
We won. Yippee.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Myth That Is Ron Paul

One of the lies Ron Paul's more vocal supporters (the hated RuPaulista SS) will tell you until they're blue in the face is that the Shame of Texas has a strict constructionist view of the Constitution. They'll hiss, scratch, and burn a cross on your blog for daring to point out the obvious. In other words, they're like Chairman Obama's Drones, big on fascisti passion, small on critical thinking.
 
 
Let's take a stroll down Memory Hole Lane, shall we ? Here is the text of Ayatollah RuPaul's interview with Neil Cavuto of FOX News back in 2009:
 



NEIL CAVUTO, HOST: Speaking of a lot of money, the battle  about the money they're spending on Capitol Hill and, ironically, this guy is  being targeted as maybe spending the most or at least earmarking the most for  his constituents. He says it isn't fair.

But we thought it only fair to give him his due and explain what is going on.  I'm talking about Texas congressman and former presidential candidate, Ron Paul.

 

Congressman, the rap is that you're a porker, that — that a lot of pork, $73  million-plus, went to your district. Is that true?

REP. RON PAUL, R-TEXAS: Well, it might be.

But I think you're missing the whole point. I have never voted for an  earmark. I voted against all appropriation bills. So, this whole thing about  earmarks is totally misunderstood.

Earmarks is the responsibility of the Congress. We should earmark even more.  We should earmark every penny. So, that's the principle that we have to follow  and the — and the responsibility of the Congress. The whole idea that you vote  against an earmark, you don't save a penny. That just goes to the administration  and they get to allocate the funds.

CAVUTO: Well, then, who — who — who proposes the bridge  or the highway or the school? How does that even get in there?

PAUL: I have no idea. But the most important thing is  to have transparency.

If you don't earmark something, then somebody else spends it and there's no  transparency. So, the principle of the earmark is very crucial. But we need more  earmarks.

The reason that we don't have — didn't have earmarks, you know, in that $350  billion on TARP funds...

CAVUTO: Right.

PAUL: We needed to earmark every single thing. We need  to earmark every single thing the Fed does. So, this whole thing, this charade — this is a charade.

CAVUTO: No, no, I understand.

But you know what? It just strikes people as a little weird, Congressman,  because, you know, you champion and rail against government waste. And I know  you rejected and voted against this package. But, yet, your constituents are  going to benefit to the tune of more than $73 million in various projects from  this package.

So, it's kind of like you're having your cake and eating it, too.

PAUL: But — but, Neil — Neil, you're — you're missing  the whole point.

The principle of the earmark is our responsibility. We're supposed to — it's  like a — a tax credit. And I vote for all tax credits, no matter how silly they  might seem. If I can give you any of you of your money back, I vote for it. So,  if I can give my district any money back, I encourage that.

But, because the budget is out of control, I haven't voted for an  appropriation in years — if ever.

CAVUTO: But would you argue, then, sir, that, when John  McCain was here saying the whole earmark thing itself is what's out of  control?

PAUL: Oh, no, no. He — he — he totally misunderstands  that. That's grandstanding.

If you cut off all the earmarks, it would be 1 percent of the budget. But, if  you vote against all the earmarks, you don't cut one penny. That is what you  have to listen to. We're talking about who has the responsibility, the Congress  or the executive branch?

I'm saying, get it out of the hands of the executive branch. Just listen  again about what I have said about the TARP funds. We needed to earmark every  penny. Now we gave them $350 billion, no earmarks, and nobody knows...

(CROSSTALK)

CAVUTO: You're right about...

PAUL: OK. But then I'm right about the whole issue.

(CROSSTALK)

CAVUTO: But are you saying, then — are you saying,  then, Congressman, that the moneys that you appropriated, whether for the Gulf  Intracoastal Waterway, the Texas City Channel, Wallisville Lake, the City of Bay  City, that rehab center — that that's money in the aggregate that you would have  called waste?

PAUL: It's the kind I don't vote for, because I don't  think the federal government should be doing it. But, if they're going to allot  the money, I have a responsibility to represent my people.

If they say, hey, look, put in a highway for the district, I put it in. I put  in all their requests, because I'm their representative.

But, if you put an earmark for a bridge in Iraq, it's not called an earmark.  If you build military equipment in somebody's city...

CAVUTO: So, you don't think their requests are wastes?  You don't think their requests are wastes?

PAUL: Well, no, it's — it's — it shouldn't be done.  There's a better way to do it.

CAVUTO: Right.

PAUL: But, if you're going to spend the money, the  Congress has the responsibility. It's better to spend it on a bridge here than  spend it on a bridge in Iraq, and blow it up, and then build it up again.

Those are the kind of earmarks they don't count.

CAVUTO: All right.

PAUL: So, you have to count...

 

Now to be fair to Reichsfuhrer Paul, he does make a lot of sense in some spots in the above interview. He was a 1000% right about TARP and building bridges in Iraq. No one can argue those points, and I applaud him for saying it. (And he also took a shot at the horrid John McLame, so kudos on that, too.) However, as I've written in a previous column, his view of public spending is almost Marxist. (Pork spending is in no way, shape, or form a "tax rebate".)
 
Not only is that knd of talk Marxist-lite, it's also something the Father of the Constitution, James Madison, would have vehemently disagreed with.
 
In 1792, Madison said:
 

 
"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish
and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor;they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, everything, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police,
would be thrown under the power of Congress."
 
(This statement was made in response to a bill that was proposed in Congress to subsidize cod fishermen. Even in the 1790's, there were slobs who wanted to "spread the wealth around.")
 
 

 
Interesting note: I found this quote in The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History by Thomas Woods, Jr. (Another "Libertarian" who has a fondness for appearing on Iran's Islamonazi state-run television station, but that's another rant for another time.) It's also a book Sheikh Ali-Paul wrote a blurb for. He writes:
 

"Knowing our past is essential if we are to preserve our freedoms. Professor Woods's work heroically rescues real history from the politcally correct memory hole. Every American should read this book."
 

 
Maybe the good doctor should read this book again. We the People get it, he sure doesn't.
 



 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Authoritarian Left Strikes Again

The Authoritarian Left (much like its inbred cousin, the RuPaulista SS) does not like Free Speech.
From the Orlando Sentinel:

"Mount Dora High School's Teacher of the Year was suspended from the classroom and reassigned pending an investigation by the Lake County School Board after controversial comments he made about same-sex unions on Facebook.

Jerry Buell, a long-time Lake County social studies teacher, said during a recent Facebook exchange that he 'almost threw up' in response to a news story about legalized same-sex marriage in New York."

I see. And what gave the school district the authority to discipline Mr. Buell ?

"School districts across Florida have recently adopted policies on how teachers should use social media. In Orange County Schools, teachers are reminded their 'private use of internet and social networking is not private' and employees should remain professional in using the communication at all times.

Lake drafted similar guidelines for teachers in January, and district officials will distribute them in the coming weeks.

'Social media is a minefield,' said Chris Patton, communications officer for Lake County schools, who helped develop the guidelines. 'People think they're free to say what they want to, but in some aspects it can come back to haunt you.'

The guidelines warn teachers if they 'feel angry or passionate about a subject, it may not be the time to share your thoughts in a post' and to 'delay posting until you are calm and clearheaded."

In other words, Jerry Buell was punished for committing a thoughtcrime.
Mr. Buell wasn't punished by the school district for making lewd comments about a co-worker or a supervisor. Mr. Buell wasn't punished for slandering someone. Mr. Buell was punished for having an opinion that was contrary to what government officials and their politicalcorrecthinkpol masters thought it should be.
Slippery slope, here we come.
See, this is different from a private sector employer disciplining an employee for doing the same thing. For example, let's say I was one of RuPaul's cyberstormtroopers and I spent my off time from my private sector job spreading hatred toward Jews at the Daily Paul under my real name. My boss would be perfectly within his rights to terminate me once he found out what I was doing since it could (and most likely would) embarrass the company, just as he would be within his rights to fire me if I was photographed at a Code Pinko rally or a Tea Party rally if he felt it would harm the company.
However, school boards are different and can't operate that way. (Especially those that accept federal funding and take their marching orders from the Department of Education like Lake County does.*) They are governmental bodies. The moment they try to censor political speech or religious speech (Buell's rant on gay marriage certainly qualifies as religious and political speech.) they are, in my opinion, violating the First Amendment. (I'm not a lawyer. I spent the last three nights at a Holiday Inn Express, but still no law degree. What a gyp.) I would even feel the same way if Mr. Buell had no morals and was a RuPaul cyberstormtrooper or a Code Pinko traitor. Free Speech is Free Speech, whether I, you, or anyone else likes it or not.
Glenn Beck is right. I don't recognize my country anymore.
God help us all.

*http://lake.k12.fl.us/1651103109482070/lib/1651103109482070/LakeProject_8_ImplementingtheTeacherEvaluationSystem.pdf
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why I Despise The RuPaulista SS

There are many reasons not to like Ron Paul's supporters, the RuPaulista SS. Many are neo-confederates who think the Articles of Confederation are superior to the Constitution. Many are neo-Nazis, who conveniently forget that the word "Nazi" is short for National SOCIALIST German Workers Party. (It should be noted that the Nazis themselves referred to themselves as "National Socialists".) Many are vicious antisemites. Many use the word "imperialist" when describing the US.
 
 
As sleazy as the above is, there is one big reason I despise the RuPaulista SS: The grand majority of them are sheeple. They are unable to think for themselves. They attempt to tear down any and all who get in their way or criticize Ron Paul or his svengali, Lew Rockwell. The majority of them think the same, act the same, and say the same.
 
 
In other words, the majority of them are like the Obama Drones that spread across the US like locusts back in '08.
 
 
Just like the Moveon.Dork crowd in '08,  the RuPaulista SS of 2011 hangs on their Fuhrer's every word, regardless of how moronic it sounds. For example, if you criticize RuPaul for going on Iran's Islamonazi state-run television station and attacking the United States, most RuPaulistas will tell you (after calling you a "neocon") that such a heinous act was an act of patriotism. It's the same kind of warped behavior that the Obama Drones displayed in 2008. (Who could forget catch phrases like "dissent is patriotic" and "speak truth to power" ?) These people aren't supporters of a political party or a certain candidate. They're a mob.
 
As Ann Coulter wrote in Demonic:
 

"Everything else changes, but mobs are always the same. A mob is an irrational, childlike, often violent organism that derives its energy from the group."
 
[To be fair: The RuPaulista SS  has never been accused of violence. I'm sure if you take their bongs from them, things could get ugly, but there are no recorded instances of them being violent.]
 

 
In my humble opinion, following any politican blindly is un-American. (Even George Washington had his critics.) For example, I greatly admire Ronald Reagan, but I think his amnesty plan was an utter disaster. (Reagan himself later admitted that it was a horrible mistake.) Does that make me any less of a Reaganite ? No. It makes me more of a Reaganite, since I'm following his advice: "Trust, but verify." The same goes for the glitterati of the Conservative Movement. I'm a big Ann Coulter fan, but I wasn't exactly enthralled with the way she attacked "birthers". I agree with some of what Pat Buchanan says, but sometimes I think what he writes is slop. The same goes for Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and Ayn Rand. I'll grant you that it doesn't happen very often, but it does happen. I'm an individualist, first and foremost. I agree because I choose to agree on the basis of logic, not emotion.
 
Can the 2+2=5 Leftists and the Rupaulista SS call themselves individualists ? Nope.
 
And that's why I despise them.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Vote For Ron Paul Is A Vote For The Ignorant Left

Some of my regular readers will wonder why I'm wasting my time with Ron Paul. After all, ol' RuPaul is nothing but a piker, and our eyes should be on the prize--- the White House in 2012. This would be a fair assessment----if one only looks at the small picture.
 
I am fighting for the soul of the Conservative Movement. I'm heading off RuPaul and his cyberstormtroopers at the pass before they irrevocably damage the Movement. If the Conservative Movement is destroyed, all hope is lost. The Republic will not survive. It's that simple. It's that cut and dried.
 
I'll be damned if I'm going to just sit back and just let that happen. Just like I won't go down without a fight against Chairman Obama and his Democrat Party drones, I'm not going down without a fight against RuPaul and his cyberstormtroopers, either.
 
 
See folks, regardless of what you've read about RuPaul, s/he's NOT a Conservative. S/he's NOT a Libertarian. S/he's is nothing but another leftist who seeks to destroy the Republic and the Constitution.
 
You heard it first, here folks. Ron Paul is a socialist. There I said it! And guess what ? I ain't takin' it back, either. RuPaul is a leftist socialist pig.
 
You better be able to prove this, Neocon.
 
Not a problem. As always, I bring facts to the party. You won't find any Chris "I'll Have Another Drink" Matthews-like reporting here. I don't sing it, I bring it.
 
 
Let's take a stroll down Memory Hole Lane, shall we ?  Check out the video below, and make sure you watch the crawl on the bottom:
 

 
 
 


Maybe my copy of the Constitution is wrong, but I just can't seem to find the section where Congress has the Enumerated Power to fund crap like a "drop out reduction program" or rehab centers. Now ladies and gentlemen, is that not a redistribution of wealth ? Is that not taking money from Citizen A by FORCE and giving it to Citizen B ? (To be fair: RuPaul was 1000% right about rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure. However, just like I don't want to pay for Iraq's crap, I don't want to pay for infrastructure projects in Galveston, Texas if I don't live in Galveston, Texas.)
 
The most troubling thing about that video is the fact that RuPaul thinks that the boondoggles he funded in 2009 are "tax rebates". Call me crazy and off my meds, but I'm one of those old fashioned types who believes that a tax rebate occurs when the taxpayer gets to keep the money he slaved away for. The very fact that he used the words "tax rebates" for public spending is telling and rather troubling. It's a clear signal that RuPaul is a collectivist with some serious socialist tendencies.
 
 
Another thing that's extremely troubling about this video is the fact that RuPaul seems to believe that Representatives are genies that grant their constituents' every wish. They aren't. We're not a democracy, we're a Republic. Now, I'm not saying Congress should act like dictators like when Nazi Pelosi ran the joint. Representatives should listen to the constituents on national issues, like when the entire nation screamed bloody murder about Obamacareless. However, "build this, gimme that" requests should be ignored since it's corrupt vote buying at its best and Marxism at its worst.
 
If RuPaul was the Pork King of 2009, it means he outearmarked the following big spender commie rogues:
 
Nazi Pelosi (S-CA)
Charlie "Taxes ? What Taxes ?" Rangel (S-NY)
Barney Fwank (S-MA)
Anthony's Weiner (S-NY)
Ren N'Steny Hoyer (S-NY)
Pete Starke Naked (S-CA)
Ed Mah-key (S-MA)
 
If you're outporking these Marxist-Leninists, how on God's green and cooling Earth can you possibly have the nerve to lecture anyone on fiscal responsibility ? Buehler....Buehler.....Anyone ? Anyone ?
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Time To Be Controversial, Time to Tell The Truth About Ron Paul

I am going to say a few things that are controversial in this column. I am going to say things that may offend a few people. I am going to do the unthinkable. I am going to cut into a hero of some in the Conservative Movement. I am going to break Ronald Reagan's Eleventh Commandment, "Thou shalt not speak ill of any Republican." This brings me no pleasure whatsoever, since this was someone I once supported, and on occasion, wrote glowing things about.
 
 
In this column, I am going to tell the truth about Ron Paul.
 
 
See, Ron Paul once had me fooled, just like he has a lot of the Tea Party fooled. I was sucked into his message, which he articulates quite well. A lot of what he said confirmed things that I had been saying for years, like the country is going broke, we're sliding into socialism, we need to audit the Fed, blah, blah, blah, yadda, yadda yadda. Granted, every Conservative on God's green and cooling earth has been saying that for decades, but for some odd reason, the way he presented it was spellbinding. It was refreshing to see someone who was collecting a Congressional pay check agree with me for a change.
 
 
Now of course, there were the accusations that Paul was an infamous antisemite. Those charges floated around for decades. I never really paid any attention to any of them, since much of the noise came from the ADL's nonsensical ramblings. (Let's face it, Abe Foxman's gang might as well be called the "All Democrat League", especially after they didn't blast Chairman Obama for demanding that Israel return to her 1967 broders, nor did they take Obama to task for his ties to the Afrofascist Louis Farrakhan, the New Black Panther Party, or former PLO mouthpiece Rashid Khalidi.)
 
Who stepped up to defend RuPaul, as Mark Levin has christened him ?
 
 
David Duke would be one. Let's take a look at what the trailer dwellers at DavidDuke.com had to say in 2007:
 


"When you think of the images that are evoked by appellations like 'White Supremacist,' “Nazi,' 'Racist' or 'Anti-Semite' – are any of those images compatible with the sorts of policies advocated by Ron Paul and favored by white activists? Absolutely not."
 
 

For the same reasons I abhor the ADL, the National Association for the Advancement of Communist Principles (NAACP), and La Raza, I abhor "white activism". The reason is very simple: It's identity politics, a calling card of the Ignorant 2+2=5 Left. The whole concept of identity politics flies in the face of Individualism, which is the cornerstone of Conservative thought. Some blacks are great people (Allen West, Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell) some are not. (Barack Obama, Cornel West, and Jeremiah Wrong.) Some Latinos are great people (Marco Rubio, Ileana Ros Lethinen, and Susana Martinez) and some are not. (Eliseo Medina from SEIU, Fidel Castro, and Hugo Chavez.) Some Jews are great people (Mark Levin, Michael Savage, and once in a while, Eric Cantor) and some are not. (Abe Foxman, Diane Frankenfeinstein, and Barbara "Ma'am" Boxer.) We could go on and on, but since you're a smart cookie, I'm sure you get it. In the above example, I judged each and every person on what they've done and said, not their genetic characteristics or religion.
 
Now, this isn't some sort of magical lib enlightenment that I have. (If you haven't figured it out by now, I don't do politicalcorrectthink.) This is how people who don't have mental problems operate in the real world.
 
A good many of Ron Paul's acolytes don't think that way, however. Let's see what the white trash fingersniffers of Stormfront had had to say back in 2007:
 

 
"Ron Paul is the last honest politician left in this country, and he's 71. Look at all the other candidates in the debate...a bunch of stuttering, lying clowns down to the last man."
 
 

 From Little Green Footballs (Yes, I know that website has gone to hell in a handbasket, and yes, they claimed credit for outing Dan Rather when it was really a FReeper named Buckhead. However, this is important stuff) :
 

 "An LGF reader emailed this photograph, showing Ron Paul at the Values Voters Presidential Debate in Fort Lauderdale on September 17, 2007. Immediately to Paul’s left: Don Black, the owner of neo-Nazi hate site Stormfront. If anyone knows who the creepy guy in the hat is, please post a comment.

Update: it’s Derek Black, Don’s son.

UPDATE at 12/20/07 5:17:22 pm:

Here’s another picture from the same event, showing Ron Paul signing an autograph for Derek Black:

UPDATE at 12/20/07 9:48:41 pm:

And if you’re wondering where these photos came from, here’s the source: Stormfront. (Google redirect page.) They were apparently taken by Stormfront member Jamie Kelso, with a Canon PowerShot SD1000 camera."
 
 

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=28353
 
 



Here's where this gets interesting: Stormfront also posted a link to RuPaul's website for fundraisng purposes. Conservative talk show host Michael Medved had this to say about Paul and his less than desirable allies:
 



"Dear Congressman Paul:

Your Presidential campaign has drawn the enthusiastic support of an imposing collection of Neo-Nazis, White Supremacists, Holocaust Deniers, 9/11 'Truthers' and other paranoid and discredited conspiracists.

Do you welcome- or repudiate – the support of such factions?

More specifically, your columns have been featured for several years in the American Free Press –a publication of the nation’s leading Holocaust Denier and anti-Semitic agitator, Willis Carto. His book club even recommends works that glorify the Nazi SS, and glowingly describe the 'comforts and amenities' provided for inmates of Auschwitz.

Have your columns appeared in the American Free Press with your knowledge and approval?

As a Presidential candidate, will you now disassociate yourself, clearly and publicly, from the poisonous propaganda promoted in such publications?

As a guest on my syndicated radio show, you answered my questions directly and fearlessly.

Will you now answer these pressing questions, and eliminate all associations between your campaign and some of the most loathsome fringe groups in American society?

Along with my listeners (and many of your own supporters), I eagerly await your response.

Respectfully, Michael Medved"

 
 

Remarkably, RuPaul didn't reply to Medved.
 
 
Now, I know what you're thinking. This happened in 2007. This is old news. You're right. This is old news. Let's fast foward to the present, shall we ? From the magical pen of David Horowitz at Newsreal Blog:
 
 

"Long ago Bill Buckley drummed the anti-Semites out of the  conservative movement, and the movement thrived as a result. But the  Jew-haters have returned. For years the Texas crackpot, Ron Paul, has  been attacking America and Israel as imperialist powers — the Great  Satan and the Little Satan, and calling for America’s retreat from the  battle against our totalitarian enemies. At the recent CPAC conference  Paul’s Jew-hating storm-troopers swarmed the Freedom Center’s table to  vent their spleen against Israel as a Nazi state. Now Paul is making a  priority of withdrawing aid for Israel  — the only democracy in the  Middle East and the only reliable ally of the United States. Here is an  alert from Gary Bauer about the amendment Ron Paul is proposing which  may be voted on today.

Thursday, February 17, 2011
To: Friends & Supporters
From: Gary L. Bauer

Special Alert

Representative Ron Paul (R-TX) has just introduced an amendment to  end all U.S. aid to Israel.  The amendment could be voted on before the  day is over.  I need your help right now to stop this ill-conceived  proposal!

Please click here to quickly and easily send a message to your elected representative urging them to stand with Israel.

Don’t be deceived.  This Ron Paul proposal would not lower our budget  deficit.  By abandoning Israel while its enemies are gaining strength,  the risk of a major war in the Middle East would increase. A major war  would cost the U.S. billions and billions of dollars as we have already  seen in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The U.S. gives billions of dollars a year to foreign countries that  hate us and regularly vote against us at the United Nations.  But,  Israel votes with the U.S. 97% of the time.  They are a loyal ally that  shares our values.  The aid they receive is used to buy military  equipment from U.S. companies so the money comes back to us. Ron Paul’s  proposal makes no sense.

Please right now go to www.cwfpac.com to tell your congressman to stand with Israel.

You may also call the Capitol Hill Switchboard at 202-224-3121 and  ask for your representative’s office.  If you don’t know his or her  name, give the operator your zip code and they will transfer you.  Tell  them to stand with our most reliable ally Israel by opposing the Paul  amendment to end all foreign aid.  Please take action now!"
 
 
 

Don't worry. Like every other thing RuPaul does, the amendment failed. 
 
Is that not a call for concern ? Now, don't misunderstand me, I am not a fan of foreign aid. It sucks. I don't like having my money being taken from me by FORCE to be given to anyone. However, in Israel's case, it's a matter of national security. If Israel was unable to defend itself, it will be overwhelmed. If that were to happen, the Islamonazis who run Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the like will become emboldened. Who knows ? Maybe they'll want Spain and Portugal back. Perhaps they'll want Khazakstan or some of the other 'Stans back. Within a blink of an eye, World War III will be wiping out millions of people.
 
But that doesn't seem to bother RuPaul or his other less than admirable followers, Code Pinko.
 
From FOX News:
 

 
"Politics makes for strange bedfellows. Add Code Pink and Republican Rep. Ron Paul to that list. 

The vehemently anti-war group is organizing a slew of events this weekend in opposition to the United States' Israel policy, to coincide with the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Ahead of the protests, a Code Pink activist suggested the group -- at least when it comes to Israel -- is actually on the same page as Paul, a libertarian and one of the first candidates to enter the race for the GOP presidential nomination. 

'The Ron Paul people are closer and closer to our talking points with each election, Code Pink activist Liz Hourican told FoxNews.com."



 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/18/rep-paul-codepink-camp-israel-aid-opposition/#ixzz1VEt4FRaN
 

 
 I see. And who helps foot the bill for Code Pinko ? (I've written extensively about the traitors at Code Pinko. See
 
You guessed it! Everyone's least favorite Nazi collaborator, Furious George $oros!
 
From Discover The Networks:
 
 

 
 
"Code Pink receives financial support from the Tides Foundation, [a $oros front group] the Streisand Foundation, and the New Priorities Foundation."
 
 

 
Yes, that's the same Code Pinko that helped kickstart the "Arab Spring" that has taken the Middle East from crazy to bat-poop crazy. Yes, that's the same George $oros who short sold America causing a 627 point loss in the first stock market session right after 9/11. It would not be beyond the realm of sanity to believe that $oros would throw RuPaul a few bucks to screw up the Republican Primary is it ?
 
 
Now, I know RuPaul isn't going to win the Republican nomination, especially with Rick Perry and Michele Bachman doing so well in the polls. But there is a danger of that miserable, old Jew hating SOB leeching off enough Tea Party votes in the Primary to hand Myth Romney the nomination. There is also a danger that RuPaul will do his best Ross Perot imitation and hand the election to Chairman Obama, finishing off the Republic.
 
THINK, TEA PARTY PATRIOTS, THINK!
 
RuPaul is a "man" who thinks our brave troops are fighting a war of imperialism. RuPaul is a "man" who has aligned himself with trailer park trash Neo-Nazis and commies who are funded by George $oros. RuPaul also wants to see Israel, the birthplace of our American Judeo-Christian values fall into the hands of Islamofascists who cheered for the murder of 3000 Americans after 9/11. RuPaul wants to slash the military and let Iran have nuclear weapons even more than Chariman Obama does, if that's even possible.
 
Is RuPaul why you spent countless hours waving signs in the blazing sun ? Is RuPaul why you spent countless hours writing letters to CONgressmen and Imperial Senators ? Is a RuPaul candidacy going to lead us to that Shining City on a Hill ? Would Ronald Reagan associate with Code Pinko ? Would Dwight D. Eisenhower associate with Stormfront ? Would Calvin Coolidge associate himself with subhuman filth like George $oros ?
 
Victory or defeat. The choice is yours, Patriots.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (38) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Warning: Dark Days Are Ahead....

According to Real Clear Politics, everyone's least favorite Failed Messiah, Barack Hussein Obama, has a 46.6% approval rating. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html It would not be a stretch to say that our Dear Leader's chances for reelection are slim. The economy is in shambles. Gas prices are through the roof. The housing market has ceased to exist. The stock market is more schizophrenic than the Middle East. The War on Terror has become a quagmire with no end in sight. Unemployment is at nightmare levels. Things are so bad there are unsubstantiated rumors that professional atheist Christopher Hitchens has started a prayer group.
 
Odds are Chairman Obama will be replaced in 2012, and assuming the RINO herd doesn't throw a socialist-lite wrench in the works, our Dear Leader will be replaced by a Conservative. (I have my favorites, you have your favorites. This column is not, and never will be about, shilling for candidates. For the rest of this article, this person will be known as "Generic Conservative".)
 
Obviously, that would be a good thing. Now, more than ever, the United States needs the common sense solutions that only Conservativism can supply. We don't simply need another Ronald Reagan. We need Ronald Reagan on steroids with Barry Bonds as his personal trainer.
 
Assuming Generic Conservative does end Chairman Obama's Reign of Incompetent Terror in 2012, all of the problems I've listed above will still be there, eating away at the Republic. On top of all of that ,there will be another problem. I fear this problem will be worse than the ones listed above.
 
The 2+2=5 far left will become violent and this could plunge the nation into chaos.
 
I know, I know. I'm not Glenn Beck. My tinfoil hat is too tight. Blah, blah, blah. Yadda, yadda, yadda. Got it. But understand this: We no longer live in a time that allows to shrug our shoulders and say, "Naaah. That couldn't happen here." We live in times that force us to say, "I hope to God that isn't true."
 
Check this out:
 

“[I] want to focus on one particular suggestion you had about using the wonderful digital tools that are newly available for the reinvigoration of democracy. Now, they have been around for a while, but they are  spreading far and wide and more people are getting involved. We need to have an  American spring — you know, the Arab spring. The non-violent part of it isn’t finished yet, but we need to have an American spring, a kind of an American  non-violent change where people on the grassroots get involved again. Not the, you know, not in the Tea Party-style.” ---Former Vice President Al Snore, in an interview with his new puppet, Keith Olbermann.
 
 
 
 

Let that sink in for a moment. This is a former Vice President of the United States calling for the same kind of revolution that we saw in the Middle East that has brought Libya to a civil war, Egypt to a military dictatorship, and the beginnings of civil war in Syria, Bahrain, and Yemen.
 
Now, we have already seen beginnings of this in Wisconsin. Check out what I found at the International Socialist Review, as the author describes the protests against Wisconsin governor Scott Walker and his plan to have state workers contibute to their own health care and retirement:
 

 

"Sick outs by Madison teachers were initiated by the rank and file. By Tuesday evening, so many had called in to say that they would not be at work the next day, that the school district cancelled classes. The teachers stayed out for the rest of the week and the following Monday, with union leaders scrambling to catch up, and teachers from other districts around the state joining the action as the week progressed.

The occupation [empahsis added] of the Capitol building began on Tuesday night, with hundreds of protesters staying inside demanding to testify before the Joint Finance Committee, which was required to hold hearings on the bill. The occupation [empahsis added] was initiated by students, but soon had enthusiastic labor participation, with particular unions designating certain nights for their members to sleep over.

This huge and militant [emphasis added] response led all 14 Democrats in the Wisconsin Senate to leave the state on the third day of the protests, depriving Republicans of a quorum necessary to pass Walker’s bill. For nearly three weeks the legislature was gridlocked. In response to threats of layoffs, the South Central Federation of Labor passed a resolution saying that it would support a general strike. Others pointed out that the budget deficit would disappear if corporations and the wealthy paid their fair share of taxes.

The mood to escalate action was there [emphasis added], but union leaders were terrified of things going too far. From the beginning most said they would accept the economic concessions contained in Walker’s bill in exchange for the preservation of collective bargaining and other union rights, sacrificing their members’ paychecks to defend their own positions.

After the teachers returned to work, union officials were unwilling to call more job actions, and instead starting channeling resources into recall campaigns against eight GOP senators. This allowed Walker to wind down the occupation [emphasis added] by slowly making access to the Capitol more difficult. Rallies continued outside, but on March 9, in a legislative maneuver, the Senate detached the anti-union sections from the rest of Walker’s bill and voted to pass them without the Democrats present.

The result was a huge and spontaneous outburst of anger around the city. Several thousand of us retook [emphasis added] the State Capitol in the early evening, climbing through windows and pushing past cops [emphasis added], who eventually gave up trying to stop people from entering. The mood was electric, and the many teachers who had joined the occupation were waiting for word from their union to walk off the job again the next day. If that had happened, other workers might have joined them."
 
 
 

The author, Phil Gasper, wasn't just some hack at Mother Jones or The Huffingtonandpuffington Post. He's a communist activist and editor of The Communist Manifesto: A Road Map to History’s Most Important Document.
 
 
Now, if you add the above to the left's history of violence (Lee Harvey Oswald, the Weather Underground, Sirhan Sirhan, the Unabomber, the G8 riot in Pittsburgh, just to name a few examples) to the attitude I've illustrated above, Generic Conservative is going to have his or her hands full, especially if he or she must make an economic decision the far left doesn't like. Washington DC will turn into Athens at very best or Tripoli at very worst.
 
Dark days are ahead.
 
God help us all.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (10) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Will The Real Terrorist Please Stand Up ?

From the poison pen of former Ted Kennedy hack William Yeomans:
 

"It has become commonplace to call the tea party faction in the House 'hostage takers.' But they have now become full-blown terrorists.

They have joined the villains of American history who have been sufficiently craven to inflict massive harm on innocent victims to achieve their political  goals. A strong America has always stood firm in the face of terrorism. That  tradition is in jeopardy, as Congress and President Barack careen toward an  uncertain outcome in the tea party-manufactured debt crisis.
As we stumble closer to Aug. 2, it has become clear that many in the tea party are willing to inflict massive harm on the American people to obtain their  political objective of a severely shrunken federal government."

 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/60202.html#ixzz1U5TO6RO0
 
 


Not to be outdone by the former aide of a drunken murderer, Obama Court Jester Joe Bite Me also compared the Tea Party to terrorists. Once again, from the Democrat Party's farm team, Politico :
 

"Vice President Joe Biden joined  House Democrats in lashing tea party Republicans Monday, accusing them of  having 'acted like terrorists' in the fight over raising the nation’s debt limit, according to several sources in the room."
 
 

Gee, call me crazy and off my meds, but I don't remember the Tea Party threatening anyone if they didn't get their way during the chaos of the Debt Limit Debacle of 2011. All I saw was a group of citizens and politicians who were rightly concerned that our bloated pig of a government was spending the United States into oblivion. Nothing less and nothing more.
 
What I do remember is a certain President of dubious eligibility making threat after threat that the troops risking their lives in Iraq, Trashcanistan, and Libya (remember that ?) weren't going to get paid. I also remember the threats that if this President with a shady, mysterious past didn't get his way, Socialist Security checks weren't going out, either.
 
So, ladies and gentleman, who here is the actual terrorist ? Who here is the one making threats ? Was it the group of concerned citizens and politicians or the President who causes the concern of the citizens and politicians ?
 
Obviously, it's our Dear Leader, Chairman Barack Hussein Obama who was the terrorist during the Debt Limit Debacle of 2011.
 
Let me save a few people some valuable time on God's green and cooling earth: Yes, I know. I'm a homophobic, climate change denying, bigoted teabagger. Blah, blah, blah. 2+2=5, yadda, yadda, yadda. Got it. To those morons I say: facts are facts. Obama threatened our troops, our veterans, amd our seniors to get his way. (To these morons I also say: PMSNBC is not an actual news source, but that's a rant for another time.)
 
See, the bottom line is Chairman Obama could have used the bully pulpit of the Presidency and said, "I am strongly urging Congress to fashion a bill that will ensure that the debt is serviced, our troops are paid, our veterans and our senior citizens are taken care of from our current tax income. This will buy us some time so we can have a good, honest debate about raising the debt ceiling." Reagan would have said that. Both Bush I and Bush II would have said that. Even Bill Caligula would have said that between sexual escapades.
 
But Chairman Obama didn't do that.
 
There will be some who say that Commander Zero's lack of executive experience caused this brain fart. There may be some validity to that, but not much. The Debt Limit Debacle of 2011 proved that Obama will use any and all means necessary to meet his goals. In this case, his goal was to keep the Alphabet Soup Federal Bureaucracy fat and happy. (If you'll note, the Failed Messiah never threatened to lay off the sycophants who inhabit the Alphabet Soup.) In the Debt Limit Debacle of 2011, Chairman Obama proved, once and for all, that he has no conscience, no morals, and there isn't a low he won't stoop to.
 
Hmmm....."No conscience, no morals, able to stoop to any low".....Aren't those al-Qaeda's job requirements ?
 
 
God help us all.
 

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Real Loser Of The Great Debt Limit Debacle Of 2011

Now that the dust is beginning to settle from the Great Debt Limit Debacle of 2011, one thing is clear: No one won.

The Establishment Republican Party lost. The RINO herd was exposed once again as the weak-kneed inheritors of the Neville Chamberlain's sorry legacy. The Authoritarian Left lost. Their overheated rhetoric was exposed for what it truly is: Utter crap on a stick. The Conseravtives and the Tea Party fought gallantly, but they too, went down to defeat as they were unable to defeat the apathy of the Establishment Republican Party. Fuhrer Obama lost when his famed Blitzkrieg stalled in the Russian winter known as "reality".

 
Everyone took a beating, but the real loser, I'm sorry to report, are the future taxpayers of the United States .(Also known as our children and grandchildren, whether they're unaborted, real, living humans or are still sparkles in your spouse's eye.) They're the ones who are truly going to pay for The Great Debt Limit Debacle of 2011. After all, they're the ones who will have it taken from their hides.
 
 
As Rush Limbaugh and others have pointed out, The Great Debt Limit Debacle of 2011 is nothing more than a disatrous tax increase. Chairman Obama and his socialist allies have gotten their grubby paws on 2.4 trillion dollars, which will undoubtably be wasted on all kinds of useless crap. That money is going to have be paid back somehow, either by direct taxation, indirect taxation by taxes raised on corporations, or by inflation. (Or a combination of all three. Won't that be swell ?) This tsunami may not hit right away, but believe me it's coming. When it hits, there won't be time to negotiate reasonable austerity. We'll have Greece-like austerity with the added treat of having the rest of the world hating us for setting off a global depression. With that hate will come more terrorism and more wars to be fought by a military that will have to buy its gear at Kmart. Like I said earlier, this may not be something that you, me, or the temporary politicians that have brought us to the brink will have to deal with. Our children and grandchildren will be stuck paying the check.
 
Is there a way out ?
 
God, I hope so.
 
 
 
 
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Pop Quiz

Ok, everyone. Take out a number two pencil and clear off your desks. We're going to take a little pop quiz. Ready ? Here we go!
 

 
PoliSci101
 
Alan Levy, Instructor
 
1) Read and analyze this quote from our Dear Leader, Chairman Obama:
 
"Most  Americans, regardless of political party, don’t understand how we can ask a senior citizen to pay more for her Medicare before we ask corporate jet owners and oil companies to give up tax breaks that other companies don’t get. How can we ask a student to pay more for college before we ask hedge fund managers to stop paying taxes at a lower rate  than their secretaries?  How can we slash funding for education and clean energy before we ask people like me to give up tax breaks we don’t need and didn’t ask for? " 
 
Is this an example of:
 
a) Marxism
 
b) willful stupidity
 
c) mental illness
 
d) all of the above
 
 
 
2) Based on your analysis of the above quote, if the Republican Party was to compromise with someone who thinks like this, they would:
 
a) be stabbing the Tea Party in the back
 
b) be just as guilty as the Ignorant Left when the economy collapses once and for all
 
c) become instantly popular with the arrogant and lazy mainstream media
 
d) both a and b
 
 
 
3) Complete this sentence: If the Weeper of the House John Boehner's compromise scam is signed by Chairman Obama:
 
a) there will be a new Speaker in 2013.
 
b) the Tea Party will make everyone who votes for this crap pay dearly for it.
 
c) government will continue to grow unabated, since the teeny tiny paper cuts in it won't do a blessed thing.
 
d) All of the above would complete this sentence accurately.
 
 
 
4) The United States is a country that:
 
a) is in dire need of actual Conservative leadership.
 
b) believes in the redistibution of wealth.
 
c) needs more bureaucrats and "experts" to make decisions for it.
 

The correct answers are: 1) d 2) d 3) d 4) a
 
I wonder how many Republican Congress Critters would pass the above quiz....
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Broken Clock Known As Bill O'Reilly

Recently, Poop-ulist Bill O'Reilly had this to say on the O'Reilly Factor:
 

"From the beginning I have supported the Tea Party because I believe it  empowers individual Americans, which is always a good thing. Also, the Tea Party  wants fiscal responsibility and a smaller federal government. Again, those are  good things as well.

But now the Tea Party has come to a crossroads. Some of its members simply do  not want to raise the debt ceiling, and that could be catastrophic. Thursday,  Standard and Poor's met with Republicans in the House to tell them there is a  50/50 chance America's Triple A bond rating will be cut if no debt compromise is  reached.

The goal of any legislation should be to strengthen the country. And there is  a way to raise the national debt ceiling while at the same time drastically  cutting federal spending and reforming the unfair tax code. If America starts to  spend responsibly the national debt will come down and there will be no need to  ever raise the debt ceiling again.

So the Tea Party people should reassess the issue. I mean, when you have a  senator like Tom Coburn, a very staunch conservative and fiscal hawk, when you  have him willing to compromise, you have to take notice. In addition, the Tea Party should be looking out for itself.

Remember, the Yippie Movement in the 1960's. At one point it had some power  and influence, but it blew up because it was fanatical. And Americans turned  away.

Right now, 19 percent of registered voters consider themselves part of the  Tea Party Movement, according to a Fox News survey. That includes 25 percent  Republicans, 13 percent independents and six percent Democrats. But 19 percent  is not enough to carry the day on anything. And if the Tea Party is perceived by  most Americans as being unreasonable, it will not grow any larger.

In fact, if a compromise on the debt is not reached, and the economy gets  even worse, the Tea Party will be blamed. At this point in history the Tea Party  could become a tremendous force for good in the country. But it could also  evaporate.

Most Americans do not like extremism in politics. We need a sane compromise  and tough economic reform in this country. I hope the Tea Party will be a part  of it.

And that's 'The Memo.' "



 http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/2011/07/22/bill-oreilly-tea-party-self-destructive#ixzz1T4zy6kXK
 

 
A broken clock is right twice a day.
 
Bill O'Reilly of Fox News proves that on a nightly basis.
 
Sometimes, O'Reilly is ridiculously on point with some of the best journalism and commentary you'll see on TV. (Who could possibly forget how O'Reilly blasted Barney Fwank for his role in the 2008 Financial Meltdown ?) However, there are times, like the "Talking Points Memo" above, O'Reilly makes himself look like a fill-in host on MSNBC.
 
The above "Talking Points Memo" is an example of not thinking through and just bloviating to hear yourself bloviate. The Tea Party isn't being "extreme" about its refusal to allow the debt ceiling to be raised. It's the most common sense approach. The Tea Party is the lone adult sitting at the kid's table at Aunt Hilda's Passover dinner. While everyone at the table is flicking matzoh (this would be the Ignorant Left saying that that the Republicans want to off Granny) at each other while pretending that they're drinking real wine (this would be RINOs like Mitch McConman and Tom Coburn throwing Chairman Obama lifelines), the lone adult at the table is trying keep a semblance of order. (Call me crazy and off my meds, but I don't think allowing a socialist president with a serious spending problem to borrow more money from Red China when you're trillions of dollars in debt is a hot idea.)
 
It's pretty obvious that Bill O'Reilly doesn't know the difference between a Tupperware party and a Tea Party. The Tea Party can't be measured by polls. There is no one organization that speaks for it. There is no leader. It is the manifestation of decades of anger at a bloated, rogue federal "government" that is becoming more and more fascist by the second. As O'Reilly himself pointed out, not everyone in the Tea Party is a Republican. Not everyone is a Conservative. Some are Democrats who decided not to jump into Lake Commie with Chairman Obama. Some are liberals who feel Obama betrayed or disappointed them. Some are libertarians who couldn't give a hoot about social Conservatism. Some want Socialist Security to be gone, some want to protect it. The point is this: You can't be "extreme" if you don't have a set ideology and you're a cross section of the political, ethnic, and socioeconomic spectrum. (In non-pseudo intellectual pointy-head talk, this means you're the majority.)
 
When the clock strikes thirteen at the Nobama Cave, odds are the O'Reilly Factor will be on. Like I said earlier, when O'Reilly is on top of his game, he can't be beat. Whether it stays on past the "Talking Point Memo" will be up to O'Reilly.
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (10) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ignoring the 800 Pound Simian In The Room

Why is the arrogant and lazy mainstream media so clueless ?

Can they not see it ? Can they not hear it ? Can they they not smell the big ol' messy Democrat it takes every couple of hours ?

Why are they ignoring the 800 pound simian in the room ? ( Please note :Poiliticalcorrectpol has outlawed the original saying unless the word "gorilla" is replaced by the word "simian". Any failure to adhere to this policy will result in a nasty protest letter signed by 400 of George $oros' most politically reliable rabbis. Other penalties may include angry denunciations from the floor of the House of Representatives by Inner Party members Debbie "Sergeant" Schultz and  Sheila Jerkson-Lee and Al Sharptongueton instigating a riot in front of your place of business.)

The 800 pound simian in the room is the arrogant and lazy mainstream media and their lib bias.

The most glaring example of this is the media frenzy over presidential candidate Michele Bachmann's migraine headaches.

Now, before we get started, let's get one thing perfectly clear. This column's purpose is not to shill for Michele Bachmann. I will never shill for any political candidate in this space. Unlike the ethically-challenged Keith Olbermann, I understand that it's my role to comment on events as they happen, not try to make them happen. Thus, you'll never hear from me (in this column, at any rate) "Vote for this one" or "Vote for that one." That doesn't mean I won't tell you how to vote, however. For example: I could say "Ron Rupaul is a nut job who will get Americans killed with his foreign policy if he's ever in the White House" and "Myth Romney is just like Chairman Obama, only with bigger hair and a birth certificate that wasn't forged". In those examples, I'm simply stating fact and trusting you, the reader, to draw your own conclusions. (In other words, I trust your judgment, unlike the "government".)

Now that we've gotten that bit of housekeeping out of the way, I can continue my rant in good conscience.

Recently, The Daily Caller (which is now nipping the heels of Politico as the website of choice for establishment RINOs) reported that Michelle Bachmann suffers from migraine headaches that allegedly puts her out actions for days on end.  ( http://dailycaller.com/2011/07/18/stress-related-condition-incapacitates-bachmann-heavy-pill-use-alleged/ ) The arrogant and lazy mainstream media, which wouldn't normally give the Daily Caller the time of day, was all over the story like white on rice. [Message from Politicalcorrectthinkpol: We'll let this one slide, but remember "brown on rice" is also acceptable.] The frenzy came to a head when ABC News assigned investigative reporter Brian Ross to the story, who had to be restrained by Bachmann's security team.
 
Uh-oh. The 800 pound simian is getting angry....he's doesn't like to be ignored.....Ok, here we go....
 
WHERE WAS THIS MEDIA FRENZY DURING THE '08 POPULARITY CONTEST!?!? WHY DIDN'T THE ARROGANT AND LAZY MEDIA SHOW THIS KIND OF INTEREST IN CHAIRMAN OBAMA BACK IN 2008 !?
 
Think about it. Take off whatever partisan shaded sunglasses you're wearing and look at the following facts:
  • In 2008, it was a generally accepted fact that the future Chairman Obama had ties to domestic terrorists (Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn) and an Islamic terrorist (Rashid Khalidi).
  • In 2008, it was generally known that the future Chairman Obama had used cocaine.
  • In 2008, it was known that a young Barack Obama liked hang out with Marxist college professors and discuss the works of Frantz Fannon, a favorite writer of Leftist terrorists the world over.
  • In 2008, it was common knowledge that our future Dear Leader had strong ties to "Reverend" Jeremiah Wrong, a vicious race-baiter who not only believed that the United States deserved 9/11, but also the government created the AIDS virus to kill off the black community. (Basically, Jeremiah Wrong is a one man Moveon.dork rally.)
  • Oh yeah, before I forget, no one was sure that Obama was born in the United States or whether or not he was even elligible to be president.

You know, it's funny, but I don't remember ABC News or anyone else from the arrogant and lazy mainstream media assigning an investigative reporter to any of the above stories. I do, however, remember Obama's sycophants covering up for him. (A great example of this is when the Los Angeles Slimes refused to release information about our Dear Leader's ties to Rashid Khalidi.) You'd think someone would have wanted a Pulitzer, right ? With what passes for journalism in the United States, it's liberalism first, partisanship second, and then back to liberalism. It's truly a sad state of affairs when the media thinks migraine headaches are more newsworthy than ties to terrorism or a presidential candidate who may or may not have been born in the United States.

God help us all.

                                    

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 














Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Need More Taxpayers ? Let's Start With Mother Jones!

One of the few Congress Critters I still have respect for is the junior Senator from my home state of Florida, Marco Rubio. Senator Rubio is the only one who seems to understand a basic truth--- The Regime doesn't need taxpayers to pay more, it needs more people paying taxes. (Why can't this guy be the Senate Minority Leader instead of that has-been Rectal Itch McConnell ? Another rant for another time.)
 
Hmmm....where can we find more taxpayers ? In order to pay taxes, an individual or group must have an income. There are no jobs out there. Chairman Obama's "Stimulus" plan certainly didn't do much to stimulate the US economy, despite its 786 billion dollar price tag. (It did, I'll admit, give a big ol' bump to the Mexican undertakers and coffin makers with Project Gunrunner. Again, another rant for another time.) Now....who has an income but pays no taxes....c'mon, Alan, think.....Aha! Got it! Let's have Mother Jones pay taxes!
 
Ummm, who's Mother Jones ? Why are you picking on some nun ?
 
Good question! Mother Jones isn't a "who" it's a "what". From David Horowitz's Discoverthenetworks:
 


"Mother Jones is a bimonthly magazine and website named for socialist 'union organizer' Mary Harris 'Mother' Jones (1830-1930). It prides itself on continuing her pursuit of socialist 'social justice' by doing investigative reporting that mostly targets corporations, capitalists, private property, and Republican political officeholders.

Well-known leftist editors and writers on this magazine's masthead include Todd Gitlin, Molly Ivins, Bill McKibben, Richard Rodriguez, William Saletan, Orville Schell, Eric Schlosser, and Amy Wilentz.

Mother Jones began taking shape in 1974 when theWatergate scandal was demonstrating how investigative reporting could weaken and oust a Republican President elected by an overwhelming majority. Its genesis was a failed attempt to save the reigning radical magazine of the day, Ramparts. Ramparts editor David Horowitz had put together a team consisting of labor journalist Paul Jacobs, leftist entrepreneur Richard Parker, and leftist millionaire Adam Hochschild to take over Ramparts from its retiring editors, Horowitz and Peter Collier. When the trio had a falling out with Ramparts staffers, they elected to leave and create their own magazine, which became Mother Jones.

The magazine was launched in February 1976.


Mother Jones focuses heavily on the evils of capitalism and the alleged desirability of government control over business. On a global level, the magazine reserves its harshest condemnations for the U.S. and Israel, and is staunchly supportive of Marxist regimes like Fidel Castro's Cuba."


http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6959
 
 



The hissy fit mentioned above created a viable magazine. (Not in content, mind you. This crap is Moveon.dork with words.) Granted it's not on the level of the National Socialist, er, uh, Nation or The Huffingtonandpuffington Post, but it does manage to rake in millions of dollars from the donations of the rubes who read the print verson and the internet version. In fact, the president and publisher of Mother Jones, John Harris, took a salary of $161, 997 in 2009. Co-editors in chief Clara Jeffrey and Monika Bauerlein raked in salaries of $174,767 and $161,997, repsectively in 2009.  (Gee, where's the social justice in that ? What would Mother Jones think of that ? Talk about doublethink!)
 
 
 
If  Mother Jones was a capitalist operation, I'd say God bless and best of luck, even if I don't agree with their ignorant viewpoint. However, Mother Jones is not a capitalist venture. They're a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt outfit that survives on donations while selling ads in their print magazine and their website. Call me crazy and off my meds, but that hardly sounds fair to for profit magazines and websites.
 
Hmmmmm.....wait a minute.....I seem to remember something about 501(c)(3) tax exempt organizations when I outed Moveon.dork.....
 

"To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated
exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates."
 
 


Hmmm.... According to the IRS rule I've posted above, Mother Jones would breaking the law if they ran stories like these:
 
"Mitt Romney, The Job Creator ? Not So Fast"  http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/07/mitt-romney-jobs-record  (It should be noted that I don't shill for candidates in this column, and if I did, I wouldn't exactly start with Myth Romney. Right is right and wrong is wrong.)
 
"Herman Cain's Immigration Plan: A Great Wall of China and an Alligator Filled Moat" http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/herman-cain-immigration-great-wall-alligators  (Here is the opening line of the article: "The longer Herman Cain is on the campaign trail, the more bizarre and error-filled his pronouncements become.")
 
 
We could go on and on with all of the other Republican candidates, but you're an intelligent person, True Believer. I'm fairly certain you get the drift.
 
 
I say this at the end of  every one of my investigative articles, and each time I hear nothing but crickets. However, this time, I'm feeling lucky. Yoo-hoo....arrogant and lazy mainstream media.....where are you ?
 
 
 
 


 

 

 

 

 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Extremism Real And Imagined

One of the arrogant and lazy mainstream media's favorite topics is "Right Wing Extremism." Much like the words racism and racist, the fingersniffers in the media and the lemmings who haven't learned to tune them out have worn out the words extreme and extremist. Who could forget the FORMER MSNBC commentator Keith Olbermann's attempt to tie Holocaust Museum shooter James Von Brunn to the Right or ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfztwxLtN3w ) or former Enron shill Paul Krugman's nonsensical claim that that the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was politically motivated ? ( http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/08/assassination-attempt-in-arizona/?src=twt&twt=NytimesKrugman )
 
As is often the case with the arrogant and lazy meainstream media's patriot-baiting, the talking heads were wrong. James Von Brunn, the museum shooter, and Jared Loughner, Gabrielle Giffords' would-be assassin, were psychopaths that were, if anything, left leaning. Von Brunn's website was filled with all kinds of anti-Bush rhetoric and Loughner's website showed that he was a fan of Karl Marx. In other words, Von Brunn and Loughner would be far more comfortable posting in crayon at Moveon.Dork or MotherBleeperJones than they would be discussing free market economics at Townhall or FRee Republic.
 
Now don't get me wrong, proving our incompetent press wrong is as fun as playing Legends of Wrestiling II after a few Jack and Cokes, but there is a frightening component to this. No one is looking is looking for ACTUAL and DANGEROUS political extremism, like this article from the International Socialist Review, which described Wisconsin's public sector union hubbaloo:
 

 
"Sick outs by Madison teachers were initiated by the rank and file. By Tuesday
evening, so many had called in to say that they would not be at work the next
day, that the school district cancelled classes. The teachers stayed out for the
rest of the week and the following Monday, with union leaders scrambling to
catch up, and teachers from other districts around the state joining the action
as the week progressed.

The occupation  [empahsis added] of the Capitol building began on Tuesday night, with hundreds
of protesters staying inside demanding to testify before the Joint Finance
Committee, which was required to hold hearings on the bill. The occupation [empahsis added] was
initiated by students, but soon had enthusiastic labor participation, with
particular unions designating certain nights for their members to sleep over.

This huge and militant [emphasis added] response led all 14 Democrats in the Wisconsin Senate
to leave the state on the third day of the protests, depriving Republicans of a
quorum necessary to pass Walker’s bill. For nearly three weeks the legislature
was gridlocked. In response to threats of layoffs, the South Central Federation
of Labor passed a resolution saying that it would support a general strike.
Others pointed out that the budget deficit would disappear if corporations and
the wealthy paid their fair share of taxes.

The mood to escalate action was there [emphasis added], but union leaders were terrified of
things going too far. From the beginning most said they would accept the
economic concessions contained in Walker’s bill in exchange for the preservation
of collective bargaining and other union rights, sacrificing their members’
paychecks to defend their own positions.
After the teachers returned to work, union officials were unwilling to call more
job actions, and instead starting channeling resources into recall campaigns
against eight GOP senators. This allowed Walker to wind down the occupation [emphasis added] by
slowly making access to the Capitol more difficult. Rallies continued outside,
but on March 9, in a legislative maneuver, the Senate detached the anti-union
sections from the rest of Walker’s bill and voted to pass them without the
Democrats present.
The result was a huge and spontaneous outburst of anger around the city.
Several thousand of us retook [emphasis added] the State Capitol in the early evening, climbing
through windows and pushing past cops [emphasis added], who eventually gave up trying to stop
people from entering. The mood was electric, and the many teachers who had
joined the occupation were waiting for word from their union to walk off the job
again the next day. If that had happened, other workers might have joined them."

 
 

I don't remember anyone pushing past cops or occupying anything at a Tea Party rally, do you ?
 
It should be noted that the author of this article, Phil Gasper, was not just an ordinary participant in the mayhem in Madison. He is the editor of The Communist Manifesto: A Road Map to History’s Most Important Document.
 
Now, I know what you're thinking. This is old news. Who cares ? You're not Glenn Beck. That may be true, but what will happen if the Weeper of the House, John Boehner, grows a set of Spauldings and refuses to allow Chairman Obama and his socialist allies to raise the debt ceiling ? What will the Psychotic Left do when the next President of the United States repeals Obamacareless in 2013 ? What will happen to the country when Leftists decide to occupy Capitol Hill ?
 
For those who say I'm a conspiracy theorist or my tinfoil hat is too tight, I leave you with this thought:
 
We no longer live in times that allow us to shrug our shoulders and say "Naaah, That can't be true." We live in times that FORCE us to scream "Holy crap! I hope that's not true!"
 
God help us all.

 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Acronyms Are F.U.N....Well, Kinda.

According to thefreedictionary.com, the definition of the word "acronym" is as follows:
 

"A word formed from the initial letters of a name, such as WAC for Women's Army Corps, or by combining initial letters or parts of a series of words, such as radar for radio detecting and ranging."



Now, that's a pretty good definition of the word, but it leaves out something very, very important. Acronyms can be a crap load of fun, especially when it's really slow at work, despite Jew Hater Obama's assurances that all is well with economy. On a boring, rainy day when I couldn't sell a widget to save my life, here's what I came up with while waiting for the phone to ring:
 
 
 
 
DOD--- Defensless on Demand (Especially if Obama and Panetta have their way)
 
 
AIG--- America Is Gone  (TARP was the beginning of the end of the free market in the United States. Without the free market, there is no America.)
 
 
MSNBC--- Miscreant Socialists Not Being Clear (These people paid that talentless hack Keith Olbermann millions dollars. 'Nuff said!)
 
CIA--- Come Invade America (Our Dear Leader says this with his stances on enhanced interrogations and illegal immigration.)
 
 
CNN--- Communist News Network (I hear there are statues of Wolf Blitzer and Fareed Zakaria in Red Square.)
 
 
MMFA--- Mental Midgets Fighting America (That's what Eric Boehlert's gang at Media Matters are. A bunch of mental midgets who like to pretend that they're not drones of the evil George $oros.)
 
 
NAACP--- National Association for the Advancement of Communist Principles  (I know, I know. I'm a racist teabagging homophobe, blah, blah, blah, 2+2=5, yadda, yadda, yadda. Got it.)
 
 
ACLU--- Ain't Caring About Liberty Union  (These lumps of excrement will help the Neo-Nazis march on a town, but won't let your kid pray in a public school.)
 
 
FBI--- Full Blown Invasion (That's what we have in the southern border states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and what's left of California. A full blown Mexican invasion.)
 
 
ATF--- America is Turning Fascist ("Yes We Can".... "Seig Heil"....I mean, really, what's the difference at this point ? We have a rogue federal "government" that wants to FORCE us to buy health insurance, decide how much water our toilets use when we take a Democrat, and judging by Obama's attitude on Israel, wants to see Jews exterminated.)
 
 
ADL--- All Democrat League (I consider this one truth in advertising. Abe Foxman's doesn't defend Jews or Judaism, it only defends libs and liberalism.)
 
 
IRS--- Internal Rationing Service (If Obamacareless isn't found unconstitutional, the IRS will be the ones enforcing the individual mandate. Won't that be swell ? Oh, look! The Founding Fathers are doing 360's in their graves!)
 
 
NSA--- National Socialist America (We're finished as a country if we don't send Obama packing in 2012. Look at the damage he's done in just two years and some change. Imagine what he'll do if he doesn't have to worry about being reelected....yeah, I get nauseous thinking about it, too.)
 
On second thought...acronyms aren't fun at all. Tommorrow, I'm going to do what all the other sales people in the office have started to do: bring a flask of Jack Daniels to work.
 
 
God help us all.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789103031Next »