About Me

Name: Absolutely Nobama
Email: anthony.digiorgio@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Yes, Chris, Calling al-Qaeda Is A Crime!

Last night, the clown prince of political commentary Chris Matthews wondered aloud if calling al-Qaeda is a crime. "It's not a crime to call al-Qaeda is it ?" asked Matthews. Wow. The lengths the liberals will go to protect Chairman Obama is indeed frightening.

The leftist press has begun its spin, calling alleged Fort Hood murderer and traitor Nidal Hasan a crazed gunman, rather than what he is: a terrorist and a traitor. Mother Nature forbid that Chairman Obama's softness on jihadism should be revealed for what it is: A weakening of of our defense from terrorists and their heinous acts. The leftist press did the same thing with the Little Rock Army recruitment station shooter Abulhakim Mujahid Muhammad (AKA Carlos Bledsoe). Muhammad admits to having to religious and  political motives for his actions, but you sure wouldn't known that if you had followed the state-controlled media's coverage of the event. (Don't take my word for it, check out  www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/06/01/arkansas.recruiter.shooting  The word terrorist is used exactly once and only to descibe the charges against Muhammad, not Muhammad himself.)

The reality is this: Under Obama's less than stellar leadership, we have had two terror attacks and his softness on terrorists is to blame. We've heard more from Obama's gang about the horrors of the Bush administration than we've heard about the horrors of those the Bush administration sent to Club Gitmo. All of Obama's touchie- feelie-let's- make- nice- with- rabid- killers nonsense is having deadlier and deadlier results. Muhammad only killed one solidier, Hasan allegedly killed 13. How much longer do we have before civillians start getting killed, too ? Every time Obama and his leftists attack the brave men and women in the CIA, more and more lives are at risk. Want to know why no one in the Army did anything about Hasan's behavior ? No one wanted the hassle. No one wanted to be charged with a hate crime or be dragged before Eric Holder and be called a racist or intolerant. You reap what you sow. If you start criminalizing protecting our country, why would anyone want to do it ? (Don't get me started on giving captured terrorists Miranda warnings and the cute terms Overseas Contingency Plans and Man Made Disasters, either.)

Underground bunkers and hoarding food are starting to look like great ideas, aren't they ?

(PS--Chris--You might find this definition helpful--treason (n) Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign. Webster's II New Riverside Pocket Dictionary, 1991. See, when al-Qaeda is killing American troops, it is generally considered treason for an officer in the US Army to send them emails. Last time I checked, treason is against the law, you dimwitted drone.)


If you liked this blog, check out www.absolutelynobama.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Yeah, But..."

Is it me or all of Chairman Obama's drones unable to come up with a reasonable defense of their leader's failures ? Every time a Conservative brings up a valid point, they bring up the "yeah, but..." defense. For example:
 
Conservative: Obama's stimulus plan has failed. Unemployment is at 10.2%, the highest since 1983.
Drone: Yeah, but at least he's trying to do something. Bush never did anything. Gotta go collect my unemployment check. Later, dude.
 
Really, folks, is this what it's come to ? Do we really have to sit back and accept this below average perfomance from our government ?
Is Barack Obama's only accomplishment is that he's not George Bush ? Exactly what has been done to fix any of our country's problems ?
 
I'm doing my best not to be partisan here, so I'll come right out and say it: George Bush did a masterful job defending our country and taming the rogue dictators that Obama is attempting to cozy up to. I'll give him that. Did he ruffle a few feathers in Europe ? Sure, but Europe owes the US a debt of gratitude it could never, ever repay, so who cares ? Bush also did many questionable and downright incompetent things, too, like cutting taxes and not cutting spending. There was also his amnesty for illegals attempt and the utterly un-Constitutional No Child Left Behind nonsense. There were many things I admire Bush for and many things I criticize him for. I'd even be hard pressed to call Bush a Conservative, seeing how much government grew under his watch. Many Conservatives feel the same way. The main difference between the left and the right is we never use the "yeah, but..." defense. When our Conservative leaders fail, we are are usually the first sharks in the water, attracted to the scent of yet another government failure. (Just like Laura Ingraham was all over Bush's immigration fiasco, or Sean Hannity railing against Medicare Part D.)
 
Notice how the left never, ever does this with Chairman Obama. Sure, Cindy Sheehan meekly protested Obama during his 35 thousand dollar per week vacation at Martha's Vineyard, but the leftist press didn't even give her the time of day. She, like Iraq, was yesterday's news. The reason: Obama, like many other banana republic leaders, has a carefully cultivated cult of personality, which in a republic like ours can have devastating consequences.
 
Like yesterday's health care debacle in the House of Representatives and the Democrats' "yeah..but" mentality.
 
Imagine all the "yeah, but..." defenses you'll get with Soviet style health care. "The death panel said my mother can't have a hip replacement!" "Yeah...but now everyone has health insurance!" "I have to give up my private insurance because I can't afford the insurance and these hiked up taxes." "Yeah...but everyone has to have health insurance!" "I was laid off because my employer can't afford all these new taxes." "Yeah...but Obama got us health care!"
 
Really, America, don't we deserve better than "yeah...but" ? Does the country that Washington fought for deserve a "yeah...but" government ? Is this what Lincoln fought the Civil War for ? The "yeah...but" mentality ? Is this what thousands of US Marines died for on countless Pacific islands ? So we could accept the "yeah...but" excuse ? Is this drivel what eighteen year olds died for in Vietnam ?  Iraq ? Afghanistan ? So we could have a government that can only be defended with the words "yeah...but" ?
 
We deserve better. We really do.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »